Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-13 21:11:21
Message-ID: m2mxqhu7ba.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Does this mean that the control file should contain a version number in
> the filename? Otherwise, I don't see how you'd have more than one
> version of the control file.
>
> Also, if upgrading is necessary, there will need to be one "upgrade"
> control file that says how to upgrade from version N to N+1.

I like both ideas. I'd like to propose that we get back to this part of
the feature later, after the first patch is in. After all, the main goal
is to support dump&restore of extensions. Let's do that first.

If some of you are interested, the development happens here:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-extension.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/extension

I've written some basic documentation in the "Extending SQL"
chapter (and command man pages too). There's not so much to tell about
the new features, as the goal is for it to fix something quite basic.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-13 21:44:00 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-10-13 21:07:07 Re: Slow count(*) again...