Re: transforms

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transforms
Date: 2013-03-13 16:54:33
Message-ID: m2li9rnsty.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> At run time, this will sort itself out, because all the required modules
> will be loaded. The problem is when you create the "glue" extension and
> haven't invoked any code from any of the dependent extension in the
> session. Abstractly, the possible solutions are either not to check the
> functions when the extension is created (possibly settable by a flag) or
> to somehow force a load of all dependent extensions when the new
> extension is created. (I say extension here even though dynamically
> loadable modules are attached to functions, which makes this even more
> confusing.)

I think CREATE EXTENSION should be LOADing all distinct modules
referenced from all required extensions functions. It does sound easy
enough to code, and I can't imagine why we would want to not do that.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-03-13 17:09:45 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-03-13 16:51:42 Re: Duplicate JSON Object Keys