Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Per-Olof Norén <pelle(at)alma(dot)nu>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
Date: 2001-10-23 05:28:40
Message-ID: m2g08a7wmv.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
|
| Gunnar =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F8nning?= <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> writes:
| > But anyway this off topic, what need to have is a build process that works
| > nicely and I think including the ant binaries(around 500k) would be the
| > best solution here.
|
| 500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable
| amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution.

Maybe another reason to look into less monolithic approaches. Both in terms
of project distribution and release cycles, I still think a decoupling the
JDBC interface from the main distribution is a good idea ;-)

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Per-Olof Norén 2001-10-23 08:38:31 Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-23 03:06:56 Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration