Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Date: 2011-02-04 19:38:28
Message-ID: m2ei7n380b.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What are the guc.c changes in this patch? They appear completely
> unrelated to the topic.

Right. Didn't spot them. Sorry for the noise in the patch, it must be
a merge problem in my repository. Do you want me to clean that up or is
it already to late?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 19:39:06 Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 19:33:05 Re: Use a separate pg_depend.deptype for extension membership?