Re: Command Triggers

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command Triggers
Date: 2011-12-14 22:44:32
Message-ID: m2d3bq7oz3.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility
>> for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
>
> That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail
> that we might want to change at some point.

Given ProcessUtility_hook, how much of an implementation detail rather
than a public API are we talking about?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-12-14 23:12:05 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-12-14 21:57:50 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf