From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extensions, patch v18 (merge against master, bitrot-only-fixes) |
Date: | 2010-12-16 21:47:18 |
Message-ID: | m28vzpmluh.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> However, the only way I can see to fix this "automatically" is to have
>> the makefiles propagate PG_VERSION_NUM (or one of the other values set
>> by configure) into generated control files.
>
> Ah, somewhat like what I was asked to remove from the patch, right?
I've been pointed off-list that this message ain't conveying the meaning
I'm attaching it, sorry about that. What I mean is that should we change
our opinion again the code to do that has already been written.
Allow me to insist on "we": it's not like I feel forced into changing
the design again and again, I realise I'm acting eagerly upon group
decision making steps before to ensure it's the final step. Well, we all
have been reading over-stressed exchanges on this list before, right? :)
Will now step back on the topic, or try to...
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2010-12-16 21:47:51 | Re: Default mode for shutdown |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-16 21:39:32 | Re: clang and LLVM |