Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated?

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated?
Date: 2001-01-30 03:17:59
Message-ID: m14NRIt-000AYEC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> It is 3.1 already. The problem is that Announce says 3.1, while the
> README says 2.5. I am CC'ing the author to update it.
>
> > I got a bug report on the PyGreSQL version included with PostgreSQL 7.0.3:
> >
> > "version 3.1 pygresql is available and there's also a 3.2 beta. the
> > packaged version is 2.4."
> >
> > The version in 7.1beta3 is only 2.5.

Yes, I noticed that just after I released it. The current beta says
3.2 already so that I won't forget this time.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Cabido 2001-01-30 03:18:45 Re: Like vs '='
Previous Message m w 2001-01-30 02:54:01 Like vs '='