Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd)

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: Jeff MacDonald <jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd)
Date: 2000-02-17 22:10:01
Message-ID: m12LZ7Z-0003kqC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tim Dyck asked me to forward this on to the list.
>
> *****************************
>
> FYI, the story is available online at:
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,2436153,00.html
>
> As I think I have mentioned, I would like to review PostgreSQL 7.0 when it
> goes gold, so if someone could let me know when it is available, that
> would be much appreciated.

And that'll be an interesting one. Just looked into the MSSQL
7.0 docs today. They don't have referential actions! So
something like ON UPDATE CASCADE/... must be implemented the
hard way as triggers. Need to look it up once again tomorrow
to see if constraints can be deferred or not.

On this detail, we already left at least one (and definitely
not the smallest) commercial database behind on the way to
SQL3.

Can someone take a look at Interbase, Oracle and others about
it?

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-17 23:23:35 Re: [HACKERS] libpq
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-17 20:25:22 Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C