Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: dz(at)wizard(dot)net, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-27 21:10:12
Message-ID: m11Vi2G-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> Removed manually. Thanks. I have been far behind in keeping up with
> patches.

Looks like :)

Well, actually running regression test emits alot of

NOTICE: Auto-creating query reference to table <table-name>

from inside the parser - which make most of the regression
tests fail. Not sure which of the patches introduced them
and why. Could you please take a look at it? On the things
I'm doing right now (adding fields + indices to system
catalogs and modifying code that's invoked during heap_open()
or the like) I feel much better if I get identical (+
correct) regression results before'n'after.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-27 22:40:00 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-27 21:02:05 Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again.