From: | "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |
Date: | 1999-05-24 16:51:20 |
Message-ID: | m10lxwe-0000bIC@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> Table with an element of type inet, will show "0.0.0.0/0" as "00/0"
Is that an error? From the discussions with Paul Vixie, I think that
that is the correct way to output it. Note that you can always use
host() to get the full string for the host part at least.
> When creating a table with either type inet or type cidr as a primary,unique
> key, the "198.68.123.0/24" and "198.68.123.0/27" are considered equal
I guess I'll take a stab at it. I just need to know which of the following
is true.
198.68.123.0/24 < 198.68.123.0/27
198.68.123.0/24 > 198.68.123.0/27
Also, is it possible that the current behaviour is what we want? It seems
to me that if you make a network a primary key, you probably want to prevent
overlap. What we have does that.
> add ability to add comments to system tables using table/colname combination
Why not just add comments to pg_description?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-05-24 16:55:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY |
Previous Message | Keith Parks | 1999-05-24 16:11:01 | Problem in S_LOCK? |