Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig limitation?

From: jim(at)reptiles(dot)org (Jim Mercer)
To: jim(at)reptiles(dot)org (Jim Mercer)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig limitation?
Date: 1999-04-29 13:11:08
Message-ID: m10cqaq-000819C@mailbox.reptiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> i've noticed that one of our databases looks a bit strange:
>
> -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 2147483648 Apr 28 23:06 gt
> -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 171073536 Apr 29 08:28 gt.1
>
> is there some strange thing that happens when a database exceeds 2 gig in
> size?
>
> i have a nightly process which selects the previous 30 days data into a
> new table, then does a:
> alter table rename gt to gt_old;
> alter table rename gt_new to gt;
> create unique index gt_index on some_field;
>
> the create index failed.

further investigation:

i suspect what happend was that the gt table exceeded 2gig at some point.
this created physical files gt and gt.1

i did all of my selects from gt into gt_new.

my suspicion:

when i did the table rename, it only renamed the gt_new file, not the gt_new.1.
then my table was physically gt (previously gt_new) and gt.1 (the original).

--
[ Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used ]
[ communications technology in the days before electronic mail. ]
[ They're still easy to find in most large cities. -- Nathaniel Borenstein ]

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herouth Maoz 1999-04-29 13:29:08 Re: [GENERAL] Desperately Seeking Regular Expression (fwd)
Previous Message Thomas Good 1999-04-29 12:55:18 Re: [GENERAL] UnixWare chokes --- Resolution