From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | NUMERIC stuff committed |
Date: | 1998-12-30 20:29:13 |
Message-ID: | m0zvSF0-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [...]
> oids into that range, while we have never used oids over 1644. Just
> start at 1650 and head toward 16384. We have roughly 16200 unused
> system oids left.
I've just committed the NUMERIC stuff to the CURRENT tree.
Used OID's 1700-1767 up to now (some more will follow when
implementing the trigonometric functions).
Well folks - it's there now and can be stressed! Don't forget
to initdb.
I'll add a first precision check using some of the complex
math functions with scale 1000 to the regression soon.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-12-31 00:09:48 | psql: stdout or stderr? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-12-30 16:53:08 | Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's |