Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Date: 1998-10-20 17:22:40
Message-ID: m0zVfUW-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

>
> > >
> > > I agree. Another good thing is that the LIMIT thing will not require a
> > > dump/reload, so it is a good candidate for a minor release.
> >
> > That's wrong, sorry.
> >
> > The limit thing as I implemented it adds 2 new variables to
> > the Query structure. Rewrite rules are stored as querytrees
> > and in the existing pg_rewrite entries that would be missing.
>
> Oh, sorry. I forgot. That could be tough.

But it wouldn't hurt to add them now to have them in
place. The required out-, read- and copyfuncs are in
my patch too. This would prevent dump/load when we
later add the real LIMIT functionality. And it does
not change anything now.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-20 17:26:59 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-20 17:12:19 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-20 17:26:59 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-20 17:22:30 Re: [HACKERS] Bugfix for rule system