Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] cidr

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, vixie(at)vix(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date: 1998-07-21 16:07:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> > 	And the type is to be a 'CIDR', which is the appropriate
> > terminology for what it is...those that need it, will know what it is
> > *shrug*
> I use IP addresses and didn't know.  I am also hoping we can allow
> storage of old and cidr types in the same type, at least superficially.

As I said in another message, the old types are simply special cases of
CIDR so it is already allowed.

D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-07-21 16:33:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 1998-07-21 16:02:40
Subject: Re: Complexity of contrib types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group