| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, vixie(at)vix(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] cidr |
| Date: | 1998-07-21 16:07:32 |
| Message-ID: | m0yyewu-00006FC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> > And the type is to be a 'CIDR', which is the appropriate
> > terminology for what it is...those that need it, will know what it is
> > *shrug*
>
> I use IP addresses and didn't know. I am also hoping we can allow
> storage of old and cidr types in the same type, at least superficially.
As I said in another message, the old types are simply special cases of
CIDR so it is already allowed.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1998-07-21 16:33:22 | Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-07-21 16:02:40 | Re: Complexity of contrib types |