Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Date: 1998-02-19 19:45:46
Message-ID: m0y5buk-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are
> > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > >
> > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> >
> > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
>
> Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?

Don't think so - not really hard tested.

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
>

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-19 19:46:08 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-19 19:30:54 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)