From: | Mike Bresnahan <mike(dot)bresnahan(at)bestbuy(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Amazon EC2 CPU Utilization |
Date: | 2010-01-27 23:15:45 |
Message-ID: | loom.20100128T001411-480@post.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
John R Pierce <pierce <at> hogranch.com> writes:
> more likely, he's disk IO bound, but hard to say as that iostat output
> only showed a couple 2 second slices of work. the first output, which
> shows average since system startup, seems to show the system has had
> relatively high average wait times of 100ms on the average, yet the
> samples below only show 0, 2, 3mS await.
I don't think the problem is disk I/O. The database easily fits in the available
RAM (in fact there is a ton of RAM free) and iostat does not show a heavy load.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mason Hale | 2010-01-27 23:23:12 | unable to fail over to warm standby server |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2010-01-27 22:55:06 | Re: Amazon EC2 CPU Utilization |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Bresnahan | 2010-01-27 23:29:09 | Re: Amazon EC2 CPU Utilization |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2010-01-27 22:55:06 | Re: Amazon EC2 CPU Utilization |