Re: Why JDBC 1?

From: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why JDBC 1?
Date: 2001-09-06 22:11:25
Message-ID: lisfptov9m4vbe2aq1kkfl9eb9fjfduf7a@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 04 Sep 2001 13:22:33 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
>version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
>run.

Ah, I see. And I assume we support JDBC 1 for applets that need
to run in popular browsers with a JVM 1.

Has it been discussed before when and how we can stop
maintaining two versions?

Are people really still using JDBC 1?

Regards,
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2001-09-07 00:01:51 Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java)
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-06 21:45:14 Fix for 2 test cases of JDBC test suite