Re: [INTERFACES] Q: Mac: Openlink->Linux: Openlink-PostgreSQL

From: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Q: Mac: Openlink->Linux: Openlink-PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-09-22 16:06:07
Message-ID: l03130304b40eaed96eb0@[147.233.159.109]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces

At 09:12 +0200 on 22/09/1999, Jelle Ruttenberg wrote:

> - password-file: PGDATA/pg_pwd
> - users in the password-file: added with CREATE USER
> - the passwords aren't encrypted
> - connecting the database with 'psql <databasename> -u' works
> - OpenLink uses the generic database-agent for PostgreSQL (95?) to
> connect to the database

I am a bit on shaky ground here, but I think the frontend-backend protocol
changed sometime between version 6.2 and 6.3. The specific change was in
fact related to password authentication. (Gurus, correct me if I'm mistaken
in this).

The bottom line of all this is that if you want to use passwords, you have
to have a frontend-backend agent/driver/module which is compatible with the
new protocol. If you mentioned Postgre 95, it's probably an old, old agent.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fk 1999-09-22 17:59:33 Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] UPDATE feature or bug?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-09-22 15:32:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hutton, Rob 1999-09-22 16:21:53 RE: [SQL] Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and getting just assigned serial number
Previous Message Herouth Maoz 1999-09-22 15:16:36 Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and getting just assigned serial number