Re: [GENERAL] int8-datatype: possible bug

From: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
To: Jelle Ruttenberg <ruttenberg(at)neroc(dot)nl>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] int8-datatype: possible bug
Date: 1999-05-09 11:54:12
Message-ID: l03130302b35b24b5c2f7@[147.233.159.109]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

At 16:01 +0300 on 07/05/1999, Jelle Ruttenberg wrote:

> thank you. I tried your testcase and all input was changed in the magical
> value. The 'NOTICE' disappeared when I quoted the value, but the result
> was all the same.

I had a similar problem when we installed Postgres. In my case - on Solaris
2.5. The problem there was that the script that was supposed to detect
whether or not your platform supports int8 and whether it supports "long
long int" or some other format as int8 in C created warnings over missing
function prototypes. Thus the configuration decided that this version does
not support int8, and it gives a constant everywhere an int8 is used.

This is done by config, so you may want to look into the config log.

In my case, things got well since we eventually installed on a solaris 2.6
and had no problem there, so I didn't pursue it further.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-09 15:36:26 Re: your mail
Previous Message José Soares 1999-05-07 14:56:27 Re: [GENERAL] int8-datatype: possible bug

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fabian baena 1999-05-09 11:57:01 Empty Date Field
Previous Message Philip Rhoades 1999-05-09 00:52:48 unsubscribe