Re: Backup with Java

From: Marc Herbert <Marc(dot)Herbert(at)continuent(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup with Java
Date: 2006-12-04 16:11:17
Message-ID: khjhcwbproa.fsf@continuent.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> writes:
>> Actually, if there were a working and maintained pg_upgrade, I'm pretty
>> sure nobody would use pg_dump as an upgrade facility anymore.
>
> You think so eh? Hint: the only workable design I've seen for pg_upgrade
> uses pg_dump as a component. It's much easier to handle
> version-to-version changes in pg_dump than it would be inside the server.

This discussion looks a bit weird to me since currently pg_dump IS
pg_upgrade; it's just misnamed.

Quite obviously it also implements pg_dumb_dump as a particular case.

Too bad the "real", simple pg_dumb_dump does not exist, it would have
been nice and useful to re-implement it in java.

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wolfgang Rinnert 2006-12-04 18:46:26 Re: web-app not working after upgrade 7.4 to 8.1
Previous Message João Paulo Ribeiro 2006-12-04 12:41:44 Re: web-app not working after upgrade 7.4 to 8.1