From: | Marc Herbert <Marc(dot)Herbert(at)continuent(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backup with Java |
Date: | 2006-12-04 16:11:17 |
Message-ID: | khjhcwbproa.fsf@continuent.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> writes:
>> Actually, if there were a working and maintained pg_upgrade, I'm pretty
>> sure nobody would use pg_dump as an upgrade facility anymore.
>
> You think so eh? Hint: the only workable design I've seen for pg_upgrade
> uses pg_dump as a component. It's much easier to handle
> version-to-version changes in pg_dump than it would be inside the server.
This discussion looks a bit weird to me since currently pg_dump IS
pg_upgrade; it's just misnamed.
Quite obviously it also implements pg_dumb_dump as a particular case.
Too bad the "real", simple pg_dumb_dump does not exist, it would have
been nice and useful to re-implement it in java.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wolfgang Rinnert | 2006-12-04 18:46:26 | Re: web-app not working after upgrade 7.4 to 8.1 |
Previous Message | João Paulo Ribeiro | 2006-12-04 12:41:44 | Re: web-app not working after upgrade 7.4 to 8.1 |