Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Iñigo Martinez Lasala <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks
Date: 2010-04-28 22:12:51
Message-ID: k2pdcc563d11004281512s22ea3095m50f328bdcdf7e5a2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you all for the comments
>
> We have not benchmarked the new hardware yet..however..we do have
> existing hardware that deals with very high volumes and handle pretty
> well (Dell 2950 Intel 5430 8-cores with 6x450G 15K disks and 32G RAM -
> Perc 6iRaid controllers) with minimal IO wait . there are ususally
> about10-15 threads running at peak time with an average of 4-10
> threads overall.
>
> We are looking at high density boxes due to increasing storage requirements.

I assume the 24 2.5" box is the supermicro 2U machine? Those are
quite impressive little chassis's. If you need something bigger, take
a look at this:

http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/Stirling-X881.htm

You can add up to 8 16 disk JBOD boxes to it if needs be as well.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-04-29 01:12:10 Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks
Previous Message Anj Adu 2010-04-28 21:18:19 Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks