Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support

From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support
Date: 2016-02-11 18:56:06
Message-ID: jlglh6r5b5l.fsf@thriss.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> - The GSSAPI authentication code has been moved without modification.
>> In doing so, the temptation to modify it (flags, error checking, that
>> big comment at the top about things from Athena, etc.) is very large.
>> I do not know whether these changes are best suited to another patch
>> in this series or should be reviewed separately. I am also hesitant
>> to add things beyond the core before I am told this is the right
>> approach.
>
> I would recommend a different patch if code needs to be moved around.
> The move may make sense taken as an independent piece of the
> integration.

Sorry, are you suggesting separate patch for moving the GSS auth code,
or separate patch for changes to said code? I am happy to move it if
so, just want to be sure.

> + * Portions Copyright (c) 2015-2016, Red Hat, Inc.
> + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2016, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
> I think that this part may be a problem... Not sure the feeling of the
> others regarding additional copyright notices.

Good catch. That's an accident (force of habit). Since I'm pretty sure
this version won't be merged anyway, I'll drop it from the next one.

> It would be good to add that to the next CF, I will be happy to get a
> look at it.

Sounds good. Thanks for looking at it!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-02-11 18:59:16 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V16
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-02-11 18:45:30 Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean