Re: behavior at the end of a transaction

From: Jean-Max Reymond <jmreymond(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: behavior at the end of a transaction
Date: 2011-09-21 11:05:44
Message-ID: j5cge8$2pe7$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Le 20/09/2011 11:36, Radosław Smogura a écrit :
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:34:19 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Jean-Max Reymond <jmreymond(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On commit or rollback statement, I expect that all the cursors
>>> are closed (all my Resultset not closed) in the postgres database.
>>> is it correct ?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-declare.html
>>
>> In particular, see the WITH/WITHOUT HOLD section.
>>
>> -Kevin
>
> Don't worry, If you "forget" result sets, when those will be GCed then
> cursors will be closed soon, too.

no sure that GC will free the ressources in the postgres database

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radosław Smogura 2011-09-21 13:40:16 Re: behavior at the end of a transaction
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2011-09-20 18:19:00 Re: binary patch problems