From: | Lew <noone(at)lewscanon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification |
Date: | 2010-07-06 23:10:43 |
Message-ID: | i10cvq$g4$1@news.albasani.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer wrote:
> My reference was to exactly the setQueryTimeout discussion, not a
> general discussion. As Oliver pointed out, please tell us what is not
> compliant so that we can address this.
>
> It is my experience that "compliant" means the way that "XYZ" does it.
> The spec is very vague in many areas so there is lots of room for
> interpretation. This makes it difficult to be compliant.
Case in point: The Javadocs for 'setQueryTimeout()' only promise that it will
throw 'SQLException' for an argument < 0 or for a query that exceeds its
timeout, not that it will not throw 'SQLException' for an argument >= 0.
Therefore one could argue that the method as implemented does comply.
--
Lew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Graham Leggett | 2010-07-07 00:36:50 | Re: Picking up strange queries for "pg_catalog" |
Previous Message | David Kerr | 2010-07-06 16:16:30 | Re: Unable to commit: transaction marked for rollback |