From: | Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to best partition table |
Date: | 2010-04-15 10:07:50 |
Message-ID: | hq6ohm$ki4$2@reversiblemaps.ath.cx |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On 2010-04-14, Danny Lo <lo(dot)dannyk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01CADBC3.17BD5470
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Thanks Jasen for your response to my previous question on table
> partitioning on query performance.
>
>
>
> A related question is how I should actually setup the table partition to
> best optimize performance.
>
> Unfortunately, my table of 20 columns will be about 1-1.5TB, much larger
> than 20GB.
>
>
>
> Specifically, should I be using a range partition or list partition or maybe
> both (ie further partitioning a child table?) and how many partitions should
> I actually use.
that depends on what sort of queries you will use.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | peter | 2010-04-15 13:12:00 | Re: Upgrading from PostgreSQL 7.4.3 |
Previous Message | Jasen Betts | 2010-04-15 09:56:59 | Re: PostgreSQL Linux Distro |