On 2010-02-25, Rob Richardson <Rob(dot)Richardson(at)rad-con(dot)com> wrote:
> If you are worried about your application still being in use 90 years
> from now, you have to take into account the fact that 2100 will not be a
> leap year.
this is beauty of implementing it using date arithmetic all the
horrible wrinkles are someone elses resposibility, and have been
well tested.