Re: serial

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: serial
Date: 2008-12-05 08:24:43
Message-ID: ghaogc$gho$1@ger.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe, 04.12.2008 16:34:
> Like an Oracle DBA who told me
> pgsql was broken because the output of group by wasn't properly
> ordered like it was on Oracle 9.

Then he did not know Oracle very well :)

Even Oracle 9 does not guarantee that the output of an GROUP BY is actually sorted, with Oracle 10 this has just gotton more "obvious" because the grouping strategies were enhanced.

Thomas

In response to

  • Re: serial at 2008-12-04 15:34:54 from Scott Marlowe

Responses

  • Re: serial at 2008-12-05 09:42:27 from Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2008-12-05 09:42:27 Re: serial
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-12-05 04:30:56 Re: COPY error with null date