| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pg1(at)thetdh(dot)com, Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous transaction |
| Date: | 2010-04-14 00:25:20 |
| Message-ID: | g2x603c8f071004131725l1c8de47fhc653cbfec4841dad@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even
>> for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but
>> not an insurmountable one, I think.
>
> Yea, it is going to feel like a ship with a leaky hull, so we are going
> to have to re-think a bunch of stuff, like how do we handle visibility,
> cleanout of old rows from UPDATE, etc.
Yeah, agreed.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-14 00:33:31 | Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-14 00:24:24 | Re: Autonomous transaction |