Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown

From: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown
Date: 2008-01-13 06:09:47
Message-ID: fmca3t$2b18$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Actually I just checked and the plan is exactly the same for those 2 clauses.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re:8.2.4 serious slowdown
From: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
To:
Date: Sunday, January 13, 2008 07:59:22 AM

> How would you rewrite something like:
> WHERE (COALESCE(b.quantity, 0) - COALESCE(b.deliveredsum, 0)) > 0;
> I could write:
> where case when b.quantity is null then 0 else b.quantity end - case
> when b.deliveredsum is null then 0 else b.deliveredsum end > 0
>
> It is butt ugly, but is that the most efficient way to write it in 8.2.4?
>
> Sim
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message henry 2008-01-13 06:40:34 Re: tcp_keepalives_idle ignored
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2008-01-13 05:59:22 Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Warren Turkal 2008-01-13 08:13:24 Re: timestamp refactor effort
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2008-01-13 05:59:22 Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown