Re: BUG #16632: Not a bug, just a typo

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, breedingsoftware(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16632: Not a bug, just a typo
Date: 2020-09-24 14:55:05
Message-ID: ff60669d-6aa2-c69e-71fa-ea6c79564138@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 9/24/20 5:39 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 24 Sep 2020, at 09:06, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> In https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/ it says 'August 12th,
>> 2020', should of course be 2021.
>
> Nice catch, thats indeed incorrect. Since there is a release pending, I don't
> want to change anything just now to avoid potential merge

Not like that ever happened before... ;)

> conflicts, so CC:ing
> Jonathan who can include this fix when suitable.

Fix is pushed. Thanks!

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-24 16:11:36 Re: BUG #16604: pg_dump with --jobs breaks SSL connections
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-24 14:08:54 Re: BUG #16634: Conflicting names of indexes for partitioned tables