| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tid_blockno() and tid_offset() accessor functions |
| Date: | 2026-03-11 21:50:32 |
| Message-ID: | fe2ay3acydk6sd3iwkvol7t3kgswzfsuaz2vdgqornx4hg7ji2@dpwilwuzq7a2 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2026-03-11 14:48:08 -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:59 AM Ayush Tiwari
> <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > As of now we don't have any built-in way to extract the block and offset components from a TID. When people need to group by page (like for bloat analysis) or filter by specific blocks, they usually end up using the `ctid::text::point` hack:
> >
> > SELECT (ctid::text::point)[0]::bigint AS blockno,
> > (ctid::text::point)[1]::int AS offset
> > FROM my_table;
> >
> > This works, but it's pretty clunky, relies on the text representation, and isn't great if you're trying to parse TIDs outside of SQL.
> >
> > The attached patch adds two simple accessor functions:
> > - `tid_blockno(tid) -> bigint`
> > - `tid_offset(tid) -> integer`
>
> How about adding the subscripting support for tid data type? For
> example, ctid[0] returns bigint and ctid[1] returns int.
That just seems less readable and harder to find to me. I think it'd also
make the amount of required code noticeably larger?
Greetings,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2026-03-11 21:58:02 | Re: [PATCH v1] command_tag_format — protocol-level command tag negotiation via _pq_ |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-03-11 21:48:08 | Re: tid_blockno() and tid_offset() accessor functions |