Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Date: 2024-01-22 04:16:27
Message-ID: fdfe8c0117391278abd32e12ac634a56dcdd35ae.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 09:03 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> v15-0004 is a stab at that. As an idea, it also renames zero_bytes_le
> to zero_byte_low to reflect the effect better. There might be some
> other comment edits needed to explain usage, so I plan to hold on to
> this for later. Let me know what you think.

0004 looks good to me. No urgency so feel free to hold it until a
convenient time.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-22 04:19:26 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-01-22 04:11:43 Re: Avoid computing ORDER BY junk columns unnecessarily