Re: New "-b slim" option in 2019b zic: should we turn that on?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New "-b slim" option in 2019b zic: should we turn that on?
Date: 2019-10-06 15:17:31
Message-ID: fda2f18f-3588-c00a-79c7-720571a64527@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/5/19 10:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 10/5/19 6:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I had contemplated injecting the -b switch via
>>> -ZIC_OPTIONS =
>>> +ZIC_OPTIONS = -b slim
>> I don't think that's going to work very well with a buildfarm member,
>> where there's no convenient way to set it.
> Can't you set that from build_env?
>
>

No, build_env sets the environment, not makefile variables, and
configure doesn't fill in ZIC_OPTIONS, unlike what it does with ZIC.

Anyway, it turns out that avoiding the issue I was having here just
postpones the problem for a few seconds, so while we should probably do
something here it's not urgent from my POV.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus de Oliveira 2019-10-06 16:06:54 Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2019-10-06 13:57:21 Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead