Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-15 23:58:21
Message-ID: fd47782239c1a7f09d2a269d99b5fe3e.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

nevermind... I see standbys.conf is now used.

sorry for the noise...

Erik Rijkers

On Thu, September 16, 2010 01:12, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Wed, September 15, 2010 11:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Now that the latch patch is in, when do you think you'll be able to use it
>>> instead of the poll loop?
>>
>> Here is the updated version, which uses a latch in communication from
>> walsender to backend. I've not changed the others. Because walsender
>> already uses it in HEAD, and Heikki already proposed the patch which
>> replaced the poll loop between walreceiver and startup process with
>> a latch.
>>
>
> ( synchrep_0915-2.patch; patch applies cleanly;
> compile, check and install are without problem)
>
> How does one enable synchronous replication with this patch?
> With previous versions I could do (in standby's recovery.conf):
>
> replication_mode = 'recv'
>
> but not anymore, apparently.
>
> (sorry, I have probably overlooked part of the discussion;
> -hackers is getting too high-volume for me... )
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Erik Rijkers
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-16 00:43:29 Re: autonomous transactions (was Re: TODO note)
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-09-15 23:23:55 Re: Basic JSON support