| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal documentation |
| Date: | 2019-07-18 12:40:36 |
| Message-ID: | fd10372f-1cc9-3068-8088-c5da27a28bf7@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 7/18/19 1:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Or more simply like that?
> "Note that while WAL will be flushed with this setting,
> pg_receivewal never applies it, so synchronous_commit must not be set
> to remote_apply if pg_receivewal is a synchronous standby, be it a
> member of a priority-based (FIRST) or a quorum-based (ANY) synchronous
> replication setup."
Yeah, better.
Best regards,
Jesper
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7_pgreceivewal-doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Lambert | 2019-07-18 13:07:53 | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
| Previous Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2019-07-18 12:39:48 | Re: pg_receivewal documentation |