Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, lukas(at)fittl(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2023-04-03 04:13:26
Message-ID: fcbe2851-f1fb-9863-54bc-a95dc7a0d946@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

I found that the 'standalone backend' backend type is not documented
right now.
Adding something like (from commit message) would be helpful:

Both the bootstrap backend and single user mode backends will have
backend_type STANDALONE_BACKEND.

--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-04-03 05:09:37 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-04-03 04:07:47 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs