Re: Fix inappropriate uses of PG_GETARG_UINT32()

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix inappropriate uses of PG_GETARG_UINT32()
Date: 2021-12-06 12:47:35
Message-ID: fca84885-8fa0-9bb3-3e44-068772c81a91@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01.12.21 22:59, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 12/1/21, 10:29 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes this by accepting the argument using
>> PG_GETARG_INT32(), doing some checks, and then casting it to unsigned
>> for the rest of the code.
>>
>> The patch also fixes another inappropriate use in an example in the
>> documentation. These two were the only inappropriate uses I found,
>> after we had fixed a few recently.
>
> LGTM

committed

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2021-12-06 12:47:41 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2021-12-06 12:33:36 Re: row filtering for logical replication