Re: Synchronous commit behavior during network outage

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ondřej Žižka <ondrej(dot)zizka(at)stratox(dot)cz>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronous commit behavior during network outage
Date: 2021-06-29 18:35:35
Message-ID: fc96b5450bca9e02820caf1705d3b5b107475ce5.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 11:48 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > 29 июня 2021 г., в 03:56, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
> > написал(а):
> >
> > The patch may be somewhat controversial, so I'll wait for feedback
> > before documenting it properly.
>
> The patch seems similar to [0]. But I like your wording :)
> I'd be happy if we go with any version of these idea.

Thank you, somehow I missed that one, we should combine the CF entries.

My patch also covers the backend termination case. Is there a reason
you left that case out?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2021-06-29 18:36:47 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2021-06-29 18:09:54 Re: [PATCH] Make jsonapi usable from libpq