Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Subject: Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Date: 2017-01-02 17:36:12
Message-ID: fc2292eb-1b87-b14b-9f13-5f6b0fcc9541@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/1/17 12:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I wrote some initial patch
>
> Do you think so has sense to continue in this topic?

Perhaps I'm not understanding what plpgsql_extra_errors does, but I
don't think either of these should depend on that being true. IMO these
two checks should be default to throwing an exception.

I think instead of tying these to extra_*, each GUC should accept a LOG
level.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-01-02 17:39:39 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-02 17:30:40 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal