Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness
Date: 2025-08-07 09:36:10
Message-ID: fb9619ec-9adb-40b8-b397-61fcb98f77eb@vondra.me
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/7/25 11:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here's a slightly improved version of the patch series.
>

Ah, I made a mistake when generating the patches. The 0001 and 0002
patches are not part of the NUMA stuff, it's just something related to
benchmarking (addressing unrelated bottlenecks etc.). The actual NUMA
patches start with 0003.

Also, 0007, 0008 and 0009 should ultimately be collapsed into a single
patch. It's all about the clocksweep partitioning, I only kept those
separate to make it easier to see the changes and review.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-08-07 09:38:20 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2025-08-07 09:24:18 Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness