Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Anton Dignös <dignoes(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2019-03-05 08:46:01
Message-ID: fb5b0c80-2b66-fbe4-a740-b1a6763358ea@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Peter,

On 2/28/19 11:43 PM, Peter Moser wrote:
> Dear all,
> we rebased our temporal normalization patch on top of
> 554ebf687852d045f0418d3242b978b49f160f44 from 2019-02-28.
>
> I will also add this prototype (WIP) patch to the commitfest of March,
> as suggested by two developers met at the
> FOSDEM some weeks ago.

I have marked this entry as targeting PG13 since it is too late to
consider for PG12.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-03-05 08:53:27 Re: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Previous Message Tatsuro Yamada 2019-03-05 08:37:17 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor