Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development
Date: 2018-06-02 21:15:21
Message-ID: fb490b44-c3e5-788b-9110-22fa308d83a2@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/06/18 17:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> ... Making HAVE_X509_GET_SIGNATURE_NID a hard requirement bumps the
>> minimal version of OpenSSL supported to 1.0.2, which is something I
>> would not feel much sorry about either like Heikki, as I have heard of
>> many vendors maintaining OpenSSL past versions on Linux, but not yet on
>> Windows. It is easy to be wrong when it comes to any company policies
>> though.
>
> I have assorted pet dinosaurs using 0.9.8x or 0.9.8y, but I'm not
> sure that any of those still represent credible real-world cases.
> More concerning is that RHEL6 is on 1.0.1e:

I was only thinking of requiring 1.0.2 on Windows. On other platforms,
the configure tests work fine, and there's no problem supporting older
versions. You just won't get tls-server-end-point channel binding
support on older versions.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2018-06-02 21:16:51 Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-06-02 21:15:04 Re: Constraint documentation