Fwd: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql

From: Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Fwd: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql
Date: 2005-05-12 14:46:35
Message-ID: fa96e3c605051207463d63f71b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support pgsql-novice

Anyone has an idea? On the subject?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: May 12, 2005 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql
To: Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Olivier Thauvin <olivier(dot)thauvin(at)aerov(dot)jussieu(dot)fr>, Postgresql
Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>

Vitaly Belman <vitalyb(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> That's the problem... Is there a way to make it implicitly open a
> transaction? For example now in pgAdmin when I play with SQLs I have
> to do begin and rollback constant because whenever a query fails it
> refuses to do anything at all until I "rollback", and then of course I
> have to do "begin" again unless I want my queries to be real.

pgAdmin really should offer some kind of setting to help you with that.
Try asking the pgadmin gurus (I am not sure if any of them read this
list).

regards, tom lane

--
ICQ: 1912453
AIM: VitalyB1984
MSN: tmdagent(at)hotmail(dot)com
Yahoo!: VitalyBe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-05-12 15:25:01 Re: Fwd: [NOVICE] Autocommit in Postgresql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-12 14:43:00 Re: Autocommit in Postgresql

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-05-12 15:14:38 Re: Using PgSQL in high volume and throughput problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-12 14:43:00 Re: Autocommit in Postgresql