| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve eviction algorithm in ReorderBuffer |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 17:32:29 |
| Message-ID: | fa89b6963899a05931f905dc7b1597e55b8204f5.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 01:45 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I suggest that you add a "heap_index" field to ReorderBufferTXN that
> would point to the index into the heap's array (the same as
> bh_nodeidx_entry.index in your patch). Each time an element moves
> within the heap array, just follow the pointer to the
> ReorderBufferTXN
> object and update the heap_index -- no hash lookup required.
It looks like my email was slightly too late, as the work was already
committed.
My suggestion is not required for 17, and so it's fine if this waits
until the next CF. If it turns out to be a win we can consider
backporting to 17 just to keep the code consistent, otherwise it can go
in 18.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Imseih (AWS), Sami | 2024-04-03 17:38:22 | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-04-03 17:25:36 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |