Re: Problem with default partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Thibaut Madelaine <thibaut(dot)madelaine(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Yuzuko Hosoya <hosoya(dot)yuzuko(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'Imai, Yoshikazu'" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Date: 2019-03-25 00:21:06
Message-ID: fa6ba10b-2123-22b6-8888-e6a3ec84101a@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019/03/23 2:36, Thibaut Madelaine wrote:
> I tested your last patch and if I didn't mix up patches on the end of a
> too long week, I get a problem when querying the sub-sub partition:
>
> test=# explain select * from test2_0_10 where id = 25;
>                          QUERY PLAN                        
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>  Seq Scan on test2_0_10  (cost=0.00..25.88 rows=6 width=36)
>    Filter: (id = 25)
> (2 rows)

The problem here is not really related to partition pruning, but another
problem I recently sent an email about:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9813f079-f16b-61c8-9ab7-4363cab28d80%40lab.ntt.co.jp

The problem in this case is that *constraint exclusion* is not working,
because partition constraint is not loaded by the planner. Note that
pruning is only used if a query specifies the parent table, not a partition.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-03-25 00:31:41 Re: selecting from partitions and constraint exclusion
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2019-03-24 20:42:28 Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]