Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2017-03-24 15:21:09
Message-ID: fa377600-7cf7-6f24-a03c-e16ff0a75f89@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Vaishnavi,

On 3/19/17 9:32 PM, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org
>
> Please let me know if you think this is not enough but wanted to update
> section 33.6 also?

Daniel, any input here?

> > I would also like to hear Craig's opinion on it before applying this fix
> > to the original patch, just to make sure am not missing anything here.

Craig?

>
> Am going to include the test which you shared in the test patch. Please
> let me know if you want to cover anymore specific cases to gain
> confidence.

I have marked this submission "Waiting for Author" since it appears a
new patch is required based on input and adding a new test.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2017-03-24 15:25:42 Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2017-03-24 15:18:01 Re: Declarative partitioning optimization for large amount of partitions