Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
Date: 2020-05-18 19:27:26
Message-ID: f8c653e8-c1e8-c563-4963-1b80562d2c1f@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/18/20 7:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:
>
>> The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
>> absent (implying 1).
>>
>> We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.
>
> Oops, yes. I added a test. Will get this pushed immediately after I
> see beta1 produced.

Thanks!
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-05-18 20:11:29 Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-05-18 18:48:44 Re: pgindent && weirdness