| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
| Date: | 2016-12-08 19:35:00 |
| Message-ID: | f89d3169-0d2c-a38d-f8a9-8e2ecc858450@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/04/2016 07:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As there was a feedback from others related to the patch and doesn't find
>> any
>> update from author.
>>
>> Closed in 2016-11 commitfest with "returned with feedback" status.
>> Please feel free to update the status once you submit the updated patch or
>> if the current status doesn't reflect the actual status of the patch.
>
> Having a consensus here is already a great step forward. I am sure
> that a new version will be sent for the next CF.
>
Please let's make sure this gets done for 10. We're planning on
breaking a lot of config things in 10, so it would be MUCH easier on
users if we do the recovery.conf changes in that version as well.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-08 19:54:33 | Re: Unlogged tables cleanup |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-12-08 19:16:38 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |