| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
| Date: | 2021-06-09 17:37:01 |
| Message-ID: | f8888d3b-2850-f4b3-0152-625b0d86838a@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.06.21 03:57, Thomas Munro wrote:
> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
> test deadlock-hard ... ok 10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft ... ok 147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
> test deadlock-parallel ... ok 132 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms
>
> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?
Can we scan all the test names first and then pick a suitable length?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-09 17:54:54 | Re: Character expansion with ICU collations |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-09 17:36:06 | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |